03-30-2019, 10:04 PM
"Nostalgia" Wrote:
"...These are the kinds of episodes they're making today? God, I keep saying the writers can't keep going lower and have to actually make something good for once, but they just seem determined to keep digging futher. "
"Tuesday Pajamas" Wrote:
"They must all be ready for it to be over. So they can go on to other things, take a break, whatever just not have to write Shamy, Lenny and Howard-friggin-ette forever."
Hello!
Your two comments have inspired me again for a comparison (you know, my fatal weakness).
I remembered an interview with a journalist (I can't remember the name but the interview) about the demise of the "Soviet-Union" and especially about the nature of the last phase of its exixstence.
"It was only all about to extend this last phase without admitting that something went wrong."
Interviewer: "And why?"
"Because otherwise they would had to admit that all the previous years, investment and efforts had failed, were for nothing."
Well, and the same I believe to see at this phase of "TBBT". I cannot imagine that the producers and writers did not realize that they ruined their series and characters. But they never would admit it.(especially not because they have earned a lot of money with it.....while sacrificing creativity, innovation and originality.)
Instead they try to extend this last phase of the show, filling it with trivialities and a defiant "business as usual"-kind, always the near end in mind.
The "U.S.S.R." was an failed experiment, a political utopy which could not work. "TBBT" was a television-experimet, which exelent worked with its vintage-concept and then deliberately ruined.
The end is te same.
The lust has vanished, the enthusiasm has passed. What is left is stubborn dutifulness.
It is a shame that "The Big Bang Theory" ends like the "Soviet-Union".
"...These are the kinds of episodes they're making today? God, I keep saying the writers can't keep going lower and have to actually make something good for once, but they just seem determined to keep digging futher. "
"Tuesday Pajamas" Wrote:
"They must all be ready for it to be over. So they can go on to other things, take a break, whatever just not have to write Shamy, Lenny and Howard-friggin-ette forever."
Hello!
Your two comments have inspired me again for a comparison (you know, my fatal weakness).
I remembered an interview with a journalist (I can't remember the name but the interview) about the demise of the "Soviet-Union" and especially about the nature of the last phase of its exixstence.
"It was only all about to extend this last phase without admitting that something went wrong."
Interviewer: "And why?"
"Because otherwise they would had to admit that all the previous years, investment and efforts had failed, were for nothing."
Well, and the same I believe to see at this phase of "TBBT". I cannot imagine that the producers and writers did not realize that they ruined their series and characters. But they never would admit it.(especially not because they have earned a lot of money with it.....while sacrificing creativity, innovation and originality.)
Instead they try to extend this last phase of the show, filling it with trivialities and a defiant "business as usual"-kind, always the near end in mind.
The "U.S.S.R." was an failed experiment, a political utopy which could not work. "TBBT" was a television-experimet, which exelent worked with its vintage-concept and then deliberately ruined.
The end is te same.
The lust has vanished, the enthusiasm has passed. What is left is stubborn dutifulness.
It is a shame that "The Big Bang Theory" ends like the "Soviet-Union".