05-19-2019, 10:51 AM
"How can someone find this finale good? Sorry but something like that I have not seen for a long time.Of course, Penny MUST to be pregnant, God forbid that there is a series in which a woman does not want children.The Nobel Prize Case - Of course, Sheldon has to get one, because otherwise they seem to have no ideas.This whole Nobel Prize- posturing was just tooo misplaced and unbelievable.especially because Sheldon seemed stupider with each season. And they really want to tell us that Sheldon from Season 1 (the Sheldon who had only his work in mind) was not able to win the Nobel Prize, but of course only with Amy? Please.What really bothers me is that this finale was as insignificant as half of the whole series.It bothers me that they have just made a standart- finale, one that is boring and does not stand out from other shows.Even the HIMYM finale has been better."
"That's the problem of the series. It's not funny at all. Just as the stupid gag with the suitcases in the elevator. No, "The Big Bang Theory" was not the last big sitcom. The series was not a sitcom.The word "sitcom" comes from "situation comedy". These are funny situations that swing up.Sitcoms like "Friends", "Frasier" or "Seinfeld" showed it masterfully. The authors here do not know it at all.Even the finale is a juxtaposition of thin action, which are filled with supposedly funny sayings. There is no sign of "situation comedy".The "nerd-thing" reduces itself to meaningless Cameos, here a completely redundant appearance of the Buffy- actress.At the end then a maudlin-one-sided speech to "friends", who have still quarreled at the beginning, who may distribute to give Sheldon the "smash".The authors and unfortunately also the reviewer have not seen the obvious, or do not want to see.Would not it be time for the others to thank Sheldon?Yes, Sheldon struggles with social contacts, but he's open to all these people.He's having a hard time with changes, but he allowed it.He was always good natured as far as possible.THAT should have been the message.It is not the "normal" on who tolerates those who deviate from the norm, so that this "dissenters" must always give thanks.Maybe it would have been time for the normal ones to thank the person who does not belong to the norm. Because that can enrich a life."
"TBBT is a prime-example of what makes a drama that destroys character development, a sitcom, or at least takes what makes it funny.A sitcom is designed from the beginning so that the characters build maximum areas of tension.At TBBT 'four socially more or less awkward super intelligent nerds meet the less smart, but socially more competend blonde', the series pulls off their jokes.At HIMYM, a group of people who all live or strive for the great relationship-dream in contrast to Barney.If you start softening the tensions, the series loses the foundation of what it builds on and the series becomes more and more unpleasant,it becomes drama without having the depth of a drama, in the worst case there are character- changes where may be none.Sheldon, who almost goes to autism / Asperger, is changing so many things a compulsive disorder one can never really change.If he stays in his character, it can be considered as difficult, but also a disruption, if he changes it, just an unsympathetic ass is left,who has always been able to, but did not want to.And all these changes ungainly to unsympathetic."
"That's the problem of the series. It's not funny at all. Just as the stupid gag with the suitcases in the elevator. No, "The Big Bang Theory" was not the last big sitcom. The series was not a sitcom.The word "sitcom" comes from "situation comedy". These are funny situations that swing up.Sitcoms like "Friends", "Frasier" or "Seinfeld" showed it masterfully. The authors here do not know it at all.Even the finale is a juxtaposition of thin action, which are filled with supposedly funny sayings. There is no sign of "situation comedy".The "nerd-thing" reduces itself to meaningless Cameos, here a completely redundant appearance of the Buffy- actress.At the end then a maudlin-one-sided speech to "friends", who have still quarreled at the beginning, who may distribute to give Sheldon the "smash".The authors and unfortunately also the reviewer have not seen the obvious, or do not want to see.Would not it be time for the others to thank Sheldon?Yes, Sheldon struggles with social contacts, but he's open to all these people.He's having a hard time with changes, but he allowed it.He was always good natured as far as possible.THAT should have been the message.It is not the "normal" on who tolerates those who deviate from the norm, so that this "dissenters" must always give thanks.Maybe it would have been time for the normal ones to thank the person who does not belong to the norm. Because that can enrich a life."
"TBBT is a prime-example of what makes a drama that destroys character development, a sitcom, or at least takes what makes it funny.A sitcom is designed from the beginning so that the characters build maximum areas of tension.At TBBT 'four socially more or less awkward super intelligent nerds meet the less smart, but socially more competend blonde', the series pulls off their jokes.At HIMYM, a group of people who all live or strive for the great relationship-dream in contrast to Barney.If you start softening the tensions, the series loses the foundation of what it builds on and the series becomes more and more unpleasant,it becomes drama without having the depth of a drama, in the worst case there are character- changes where may be none.Sheldon, who almost goes to autism / Asperger, is changing so many things a compulsive disorder one can never really change.If he stays in his character, it can be considered as difficult, but also a disruption, if he changes it, just an unsympathetic ass is left,who has always been able to, but did not want to.And all these changes ungainly to unsympathetic."