BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE
#26
I was slightly more pissed that Thor left Loki's "body" lying around on Svartalfheim. Yes yes there was a massive dust storm, and Malekith had ponced off with the the ether (as you do), and Thor and his pet Barbie had to go stop the nine realms from converging, largely by the strategic placing of giant magic toothpicks, if you ask me, but he'd just saved BOTH their miserable lives, so at least walk a few goddamn steps carrying the fucker, a la English Patient!
But NO! It's OH GOD LOKI'S DEAD NOOOOOOOOOO-well that's a pity. Off we go, twiddle-de-fuckedy-dee...

Yes I do know that THE PLOT demanded that Loki be left alone to do his glowy green Lazarus act, but it still rankles.

[Image: 6c6df4ac96f0862ca318d71372f96354.jpg]

Thor and his ADD.
"WHERE THE HELL'S MY PARACHUTE?"
The following 3 users Like Idle Miscreant's post:
  • Nutz, Toad, CassandraElise
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Jomi25 - 12-17-2015, 02:37 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by SpaceAnJL - 12-17-2015, 07:23 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 12-19-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Jomi25 - 12-20-2015, 09:28 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 12-24-2015, 08:18 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 12-30-2015, 09:25 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 01-20-2016, 05:33 AM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by SpaceAnJL - 02-02-2016, 09:30 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 02-02-2016, 11:28 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Nutz - 02-13-2016, 06:08 AM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Idle Miscreant - 02-13-2016, 08:55 AM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 02-23-2016, 10:35 PM
RE: BURDENED WITH GLORIOUS PURPOSE - by Toad - 03-12-2016, 10:20 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)