An Un-unravelable Web?
#54
DigitalSpy Jim Parsons October 5 2011

http://www.digitalspy.ca/ustv/s217/the-b...VQMNuiiPKW

Memorable Lines:
[JP]: "I feel like Sheldon seems to approach every situation by trying to figure out the scientific nature of things. I like how his scientific reasoning so frequently doesn't work in the real world when he's dealing with Penny or when he's out in a restaurant - but he sticks to his guns. I really like that about him. He's very sure of himself in a lot of ways and I think that's very neat."

Mood of the Masses: No Comments.

TVLine 100th Episode December 16 2011

http://tvline.com/2011/12/16/big-bang-th...-spoilers/

Memorable Lines:
[CL]:“The friendship is going well, but then we throw in a moment where she was drunk and [said] she regretted breaking up with him. So, although it is a little risky, it felt like the right thing to do, to explore Leonard and Penny again in the 100th episode.
“It felt true to the characters,” he added, “that they would want to try again.”

Not only that, but it also felt true to the series itself. “When we wrote the 100th episode, we went back and watched the pilot,” explained exec producer Bill Prady, because “we wanted to circle back to the inciting incident for [everything], which is when Leonard, who has Sheldon [pulling] him away from the world, meets Penny, who pulls him toward it. So, that’s what we set out to explore in the 100th episode.”

Mood of the Masses:

**There's a significant battle between those that love the Lenny and those who sees it as the weak link of the show, with Leonard being the problem.

"But I do agree if they put L/P back together, keep them that way. No more breakups. Let Howard/Bernadette or Sheldon/Amy have the wacky relationship." [PJM]

"I don’t know why they keep going back to Leonard and Penny. I thought that was dealt and done with. Also what do they mean it “felt true to the characters”? Was there Leonard and Penny interaction expect for that episode where they went on that date? And that episode proved to me that these two do not work together in a relationship. Sorry, I thought this season was about geekery like it used to be. This should not be the Leonard and Penny show. They’re one of the most boring couples. As for Sheldon pulling Leonard away from the world, I don’t see that either. Maybe the writers should not only write, but also watch their show closely. If anything, Sheldon has been pulled into the outer world. Leonard is where he’s always been." [Blurbs]

"Leonard was the reason of why they got to be friends, but honestly, if he disappeared I bet the bonding agent would be Penny and the show wouldn’t be affected, he has been so bland and douche-y this past two seasons.
Penny hangs out with them all and considers them all friends. Unless the writers think that if Leonard is not there then Penny wouldn’t hang out with them, which would be a huge disappointment and an awful thing to do to her character. To isolate her character to be just about Leonard, and enhance this “soul-mate” thing by making Leonard be the only reason she hangs out with them. That would remind me too much of this Bella/Edward thing, where her character exists solely for him. They are doing that right now, Penny is not a character unless there is a Leonard subtext over there.
She is a lush, depressive version of the fiery, stubborn but kind blond she was before, if coupling her with Leonard makes her that way, then the writers can’t question why some people don’t like LP" [Zarza]

"Rachel getting his “Frank says relax” shirt when breaking up with him was more engaging and sweet than Penny getting that snowcope from Leonard ever was. It’s all about timing, symmetry, and dialogue development.
The writers are trying to make LP the new version of RR, but honestly, that lost its appeal the moment they didn’t manage to make it better or original. LP feels oddly like the writers see themselves as Leonard getting the hot chick, and they haven’t done a convincing job of changing that premise." [Fer]

**The topic of Shenny came up and there were some that stood for the cause others were quite adamant that they were 'brother and sister' and to suggest a romantic twist was delusional. That being said, many did admit that Sheldon and Penny had the best banter/comedic chemistry.

" Whether Sheldon and Penny belong together or not you can’t deny that people like their scenes and it’s general principle to say it’s because they enjoy each other and have great chemistry (the actors).
And it’s awful to isolate Penny from everything she is and describe her as something that was influenced by Leonard, rather than what she is as herself.
Her most prominent growth was in season two, where she was kind, stubborn, fiery and sweet to all her friends. In season three she was just the girlfriend who was so pretty but a ditz." [Fer]

**On Amy and Sheldon, there's the divide between exploring the Shamy relationship and getting rid of Amy's character altogether:

I used to feel this way, but I really like Sheldon and Amy! I would like to see Sheldon really give that relationship a go! I just think it has to go slow so they don’t completely break his character. [Jenny]

And Please get rid of Amy. I don’t mind Sheldon having a female friend, but Amy is creepy and disgusting. [Templar]

I totally agree and she looks SO OLD that Sheldon actually looks pretty when he’s sitting right next to her. I think they should explore the idea of having a smart but goofy funny pretty Zoey Deschanel type of actor playing her character in New Girl as Sheldon’s girlfriend or friend. That would provide a sort of balance to the personality types in the show. The love affairs should totally not be the focus of the show but the dynamics between the guys. The love angles should only be an occasional spice for spunk. [Greta]
Let's go exploring!
The following 2 users Like wellplayedpenny's post:
  • devilbk, Toad
Reply


Messages In This Thread
An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-25-2014, 11:31 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Gamma - 11-25-2014, 12:18 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 11-25-2014, 01:14 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-26-2014, 09:40 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 11-26-2014, 06:26 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-27-2014, 04:43 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-27-2014, 07:53 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Trust No One - 11-27-2014, 08:37 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-27-2014, 08:45 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Trust No One - 11-27-2014, 08:49 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 11-27-2014, 09:01 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Tuesday Pajamas - 12-01-2014, 08:26 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-28-2014, 09:00 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 11-28-2014, 10:34 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-28-2014, 11:09 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 11-29-2014, 09:42 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 11-30-2014, 09:18 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 12-02-2014, 03:05 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-10-2014, 09:24 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 12-10-2014, 11:05 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 12-10-2014, 02:14 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by lewstonewar - 12-11-2014, 12:44 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-11-2014, 10:24 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-13-2014, 08:07 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-14-2014, 08:17 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 12-14-2014, 06:10 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-18-2014, 09:21 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-18-2014, 10:26 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 12-18-2014, 11:22 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 12-18-2014, 11:24 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-08-2015, 10:09 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-08-2015, 10:33 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-08-2015, 10:58 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Gamma - 01-08-2015, 12:44 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-08-2015, 01:13 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Trust No One - 01-08-2015, 10:04 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Trust No One - 01-09-2015, 12:47 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-10-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-13-2015, 08:11 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-13-2015, 08:18 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 01-13-2015, 08:48 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by devilbk - 01-13-2015, 09:39 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-13-2015, 09:51 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Tuesday Pajamas - 01-14-2015, 12:16 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-14-2015, 09:02 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-14-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 01-14-2015, 07:15 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by SpaceAnJL - 01-14-2015, 10:32 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-16-2015, 08:28 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-17-2015, 04:22 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-17-2015, 07:38 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-20-2015, 09:11 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-20-2015, 09:55 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 01-31-2015, 07:49 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-31-2015, 07:16 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by SpaceAnJL - 01-31-2015, 07:53 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 01-31-2015, 08:06 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 02-01-2015, 07:28 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Trust No One - 02-16-2015, 07:54 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Tuesday Pajamas - 02-18-2015, 05:00 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Louise - 02-18-2015, 01:26 PM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 02-23-2015, 06:43 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 02-23-2015, 07:28 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Idle Miscreant - 02-23-2015, 07:39 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 02-23-2015, 08:02 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Nutz - 03-03-2015, 09:30 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Nutz - 03-05-2015, 08:25 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by devilbk - 03-05-2015, 09:16 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Tuesday Pajamas - 03-08-2015, 12:31 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by wellplayedpenny - 03-09-2015, 06:46 AM
RE: An Un-unravelable Web? - by Tuesday Pajamas - 03-09-2015, 10:20 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)