Shenny HQ
Theoretical science discussion! - Printable Version

+- Shenny HQ (https://shennyhq.co.uk/dir)
+-- Forum: Everything else (https://shennyhq.co.uk/dir/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: A Little Physics (https://shennyhq.co.uk/dir/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Thread: Theoretical science discussion! (/showthread.php?tid=131)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 07-16-2014

[Image: med_robot_mech_brain.jpg]

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 10-01-2014

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/sep/29/swedish-cientists-bet-bob-dylan-lyrics-research-papers

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - Tuesday Pajamas - 10-04-2014

A look at the universe... and where we are on the map.





RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 10-05-2014

^Mind blowing! I watched some fascinating programmes about the cosmos(BBC4) recently. Apparently the Earth has 6 billion years before it is consummed by our sun, and even the cosmos its self will die when stars run out of hydrogen to burn, and everything goes dark! It also showed how our four guys are actually a team, working together. Theoretical physicists come up with concepts(like White Dwarfs, or Super Massive Black Holes), which they then prove exist with maths, experimental physicists also come up with ideas but generally use experiments to prove, or disprove the concepts of theretical physicists. Astrophysicists also try to prove or disprove the concepts put forward by the other two, through observation of the cosmos, and analysing data. Aerospace Engineers then test the theories by designing, and building satelittes, and space craft(incl:telescopes), that can actually see, or go and test the theories.

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - wellplayedpenny - 10-12-2014

Not to mention before the big lights out our galaxy is on a collision course with Andromeda. Eventually there will be nothing left in the universe as even black holes will collapse. Makes me feel especially privileged to be alive and able to experience the universe in its bustling glory.

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 10-22-2014

Sounds like we're in for quite a ride. In films like Danny Boyle's Sunshine they have self sustaining space craft(growing their own food,etc), it's a shame we don't see the Earth like that, a giant space craft that we need to take care of.



RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 12-07-2014

I am interested in our relationship with technology. Automatons were once viewed as entertainment. Then they were envisioned as servants of humans. Recently they have been viewed as destroyers. imagination eh!






RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 12-08-2014

History of SciFi programme showed inspiration for C-3PO>[Image: Metropolis_Maria_scene_1.gif] which gives us the humanoid evolutionary strand>[Image: ceatec_robot_2.jpg] Also how droid strand, inc: R2-D2, came from makers of Silent Running, realised they could use amputees(to get non-human look)>[Image: Silent-running-frankenstein-x640.jpg] which gives us this type>[Image: K5-by-Knightscope-004.jpg]

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - Louise - 12-08-2014

The little one looks like a coffee grinder.
(07-16-2014, 04:22 AM)ricardo shillyshally Wrote: [Image: med_robot_mech_brain.jpg]


Is the Plot Robot responsible for recent seasons of BBT??

RE: Theoretical science discussion! - ricardo shillyshally - 12-09-2014

Yes that's what I was thinking. I bet there's some plot producing program. That's the 'K5 autonomous crime prevention robot'(and that's all I know). I think they've replaced all the workers behind the scenes, with robots like Howard's robotic arm, and now they are developing humanoid ones as ; receptionists, security guards, teachers. They think we'll interact better if they look humanoid. I think I find them a bit creepy. Another receptionist! [Image: Robot-receptionist-007.jpg]